MacBook SSD may actually be one of the fastest MacBooks 1
Yes it expensive, but the first early benchmarks and user reports are trickling in now and it looks very impressive indeed. This adds even more fuel into the internal MacBook controversy I’m facing.
MacRumors user bjdraw posted XBench marks for the MacBook Air 1.8GHz SSD
Was just at the Apple store playing with the 1.8 SSD. I downloaded xBench and ran the test. The overall disk score was 48, which is faster than any Apple laptop benched recently by Engadget .
Salty Pirate also tried it out:
The SSD is wicked fast. Programs load almost instantly. Faster than on my MBP 2.4 with a 200GB 7200 disk. I have changed my mind and I am gonna get the SSD link
Viper says:
I think you would notice a performance difference….what i have read is that opening itunes with the SSD takes <1 bounce of the dock icon, while with the 1.6/80 it takes 2-3 bounces....since this action is mostly reading from the HDD and not processor intense, you can infer that the SSD is much faster. link
Suitability for development
Assuming that you can weed your stuff down to fit on the 64GB model, what about development speed.
SSD drives are fast at anything except random access writes, which I think is what goes on when you compile code and run lots of inserts and updates in a database. Can anyone provide an opinion on this? It’s not that I’m going to be hosting on it, but it would be nice if autotest speeds aren’t adversely affected by it as I talked about in my previous MacBook Air Post.
For easy reading here are the XBench Bench marks:
Results 59.23
System Info
Xbench Version 1.3
System Version 10.5.1 (9B2324)
Physical RAM 2048 MB
Model MacBookAir1,1
Drive Type MCCOE64GEMPP MCCOE64GEMPP
CPU Test 99.61
GCD Loop 198.48 10.46 Mops/sec
Floating Point Basic 91.95 2.18 Gflop/sec
vecLib FFT 82.14 2.71 Gflop/sec
Floating Point Library 82.87 14.43 Mops/sec
Thread Test 134.99
Computation 132.25 2.68 Mops/sec, 4 threads
Lock Contention 137.85 5.93 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads
Memory Test 148.00
System 147.16
Allocate 196.92 723.16 Kalloc/sec
Fill 121.83 5923.81 MB/sec
Copy 140.85 2909.18 MB/sec
Stream 148.84
Copy 139.04 2871.77 MB/sec
Scale 138.74 2866.37 MB/sec
Add 160.25 3413.70 MB/sec
Triad 160.42 3431.74 MB/sec
Quartz Graphics Test 107.74
Line 111.96 7.45 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
Rectangle 120.42 35.95 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
Circle 97.44 7.94 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
Bezier 109.91 2.77 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]
Text 101.95 6.38 Kchars/sec
OpenGL Graphics Test 18.27
Spinning Squares 18.27 23.18 frames/sec
User Interface Test 113.53
Elements 113.53 521.06 refresh/sec
Disk Test 47.26
Sequential 40.82
Uncached Write 33.92 20.83 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write 46.51 26.32 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read 27.24 7.97 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read 97.00 48.75 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Random 56.13
Uncached Write 21.06 2.23 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write 52.85 16.92 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read 990.68 7.02 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read 259.96 48.24 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Create a Software Development Agreement with our free web service Agree2
Trackbacks
Use the following link to trackback from your own site:
http://stakeventures.com/articles/trackback/269





Well, good luck and all.
But it’s a bit like faster boot times – I don’t reboot my mac more than once a fortnight, so it’s moot.
Similarly, I can fit enough RAM in my MBP (or Macbook) to ensure i only need to start iTunes once and leave it running forever.
Remember you’ll have a lot less disk, so your iTunes library is going to be a lot smaller – hence faster to load up :)